Web 2.0 technologies are described as database driven.

Web 2.0 technologies are described as database driven.

• A. They are client-only
• B. They require no servers
• C. They are database driven
• D. They are irrelevant

Answer: (C)

Web 2.0 applications rely on databases to store and manage the large amounts of user-generated data and dynamic content that define these platforms. The experience isn’t just static pages on the client; servers handle requests and data is kept in database systems that the app queries to assemble pages, feeds, and interactions in real time. For example, user profiles, posts, comments, likes, and relationships are stored in databases and retrieved or updated as you interact with the site. That makes the description of being database driven the most accurate. Being client-only would ignore the need for server-side data storage, and saying they require no servers contradicts the architecture that handles data persistence and retrieval. Saying they are irrelevant doesn’t reflect how central data storage and retrieval are to Web 2.0 experiences.

Web 2.0 applications rely on databases to store and manage the large amounts of user-generated data and dynamic content that define these platforms. The experience isn’t just static pages on the client; servers handle requests and data is kept in database systems that the app queries to assemble pages, feeds, and interactions in real time. For example, user profiles, posts, comments, likes, and relationships are stored in databases and retrieved or updated as you interact with the site.

That makes the description of being database driven the most accurate. Being client-only would ignore the need for server-side data storage, and saying they require no servers contradicts the architecture that handles data persistence and retrieval. Saying they are irrelevant doesn’t reflect how central data storage and retrieval are to Web 2.0 experiences.